Heitmann's Proposition 1 #
If a subring R of a complete local domain T surjects onto T/M^2 and satisfies IT cap R = I for all finitely generated ideals I, then R is Noetherian with completion isomorphic to T. Also: when depth T >= 2, associated primes of T have height at most 1.
Heitmann, "Characterization of completions of UFDs", 1993, Prop. 1.
Helper lemmas for the completion isomorphism #
Under the hypotheses of Proposition 1, M = M_R · T. This is a Nakayama argument: R + M² = T implies M ≤ Ideal.map R.subtype M_R + M², and since M is f.g. and M ≤ jacobson ⊥, Nakayama gives M ≤ Ideal.map R.subtype M_R.
Proposition 1: Criterion for Noetherian completion #
If (R, M ∩ R) ⊆ (T, M) with R → T/M² surjective and IT ∩ R = I for all finitely generated ideals I, then R is Noetherian and R̂ ≅ T.
Heitmann's Proposition 1: A subring R of a complete local ring T satisfying
- R → T/M² surjective
- IT ∩ R = I for all finitely generated ideals I of R is Noetherian with completion isomorphic to T.
Auxiliary: Depth ≥ 2 implies associated prime conditions #
From depth T ≥ 2, we derive:
- M is not an associated prime of T/rT for any nonzero r (since ht(M) ≥ 2 > 1)
- All associated primes of T/rT have height ≤ 1 (Krull PIT for principal ideals)
In a local domain with depth ≥ 2, the maximal ideal M is not an associated prime of T/rT for any nonzero r. This follows because if M ∈ Ass(T/rT) then depth(M, T/rT) = 0, but depth(M, T) ≥ 2 and r is regular (domain) so depth(M, T/rT) ≥ 1 by the depth lemma.
In a Noetherian local domain with depth ≥ 2, if all primes P ≠ M have height ≤ 1, then associated primes of T/rT for nonzero r have height ≤ 1. The height hypothesis holds for our concrete T (dim = 2).