Twice-marked banana graphs: definitions #
This is the paper-specific vocabulary for the twice-marked banana paper. A banana
of genus g is represented by the existing positive subdivision model with
two core vertices and g + 1 distinct edge slots. Thus parallel strands are
retained by construction, rather than identified as a simple graph.
A genus-g banana graph: g + 1 positive-length strands between two core
vertices.
Equations
Instances For
A concrete banana with prescribed positive strand lengths: the two-vertex
core with g + 1 parallel strands, none of which is a loop. This is the
coordinate-first constructor behind the notation B_{n₀,…,nₑ} and, at
g = 2, θ_{a,b,c}.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The vertex at position i along strand α, measured from core vertex
0. SubdivisionGraph.Spec allows an individual slot to be stored in either
orientation, so this deliberately reverses its coordinate when necessary.
Equations
Instances For
Reflection of a normalized strand coordinate about its midpoint.
Instances For
The two multivalent vertices of a banana.
Instances For
The right multivalent endpoint of the banana graph.
Instances For
Bundle a graph and an ordered pair of its vertices as a twice-marked graph.
Equations
- Bananas.mark G u v = { graph := G, u := u, v := v }
Instances For
Paper source: def-Delt (Definition 2.8), the function Δ(D).
The paper's second rank difference, relative to the two marks.
Equations
Instances For
Paper source: def-submod (Definition 2.9).
Submodularity of a divisor, including all of its marked twists.
Equations
- Bananas.Submodular M D = ∀ (a b : ℤ), 0 ≤ Bananas.rankDelta M (Bananas.twist M D a b)
Instances For
Every divisor is submodular for this marked graph.
Equations
- Bananas.AllSubmodular M = ∀ (D : CFDiv M.graph), Bananas.Submodular M D
Instances For
Paper source: the hypothesis ku ∼ kv of the k-general transmission
definition (Definition 1.10), not the torsion order of def-TwMkGraph.
A positive k kills the degree-zero class of the marked-point difference.
Equations
Instances For
Paper source: def-TwMkGraph (Definition 2.6), the torsion order.
The torsion order is the least positive k killing the marked difference.
Equations
- Bananas.IsTorsionOrder M k = (Bananas.TorsionWitness M k ∧ ∀ (m : ℕ), Bananas.TorsionWitness M m → k ≤ m)
Instances For
Paper source: def-tauD (Definition 2.11), the transmission permutation
τ^{u,v}_D characterised by δ(τ(b) = a) = Δ(D + au - bv).
We keep the permutation as an integer function; bijectivity is stated here
instead of using a separate affine-permutation structure. Note that the
main library models the same notion by AspPerm together with
Utilities.SatisfiesTransmission; the two presentations are not yet
connected by any lemma.
Equations
Instances For
Paper source: def-inv (Definition 2.13), the set Inv_k(τ).
The paper's k-inversions are k-equivalence classes of inversions, where
(a,b) ∼ (a',b') iff a - a' = b - b' and a ≡ a' (mod k). Each class has
a unique representative with 0 ≤ a < k, and this set of representatives is
what is recorded here.
Instances For
Paper source: def-inv (Definition 2.13), the number inv_k(τ).
Equations
- Bananas.kInversionCount k τ = (Bananas.kInversions k τ).ncard
Instances For
Paper source: Definition 1.10, k-general transmission.
Stated directly in terms of transmission permutations and their
k-inversion counts. The (kInversions k τ).Finite conjunct is not
redundant decoration: Set.ncard is 0 on an infinite set, so without it
the count bound would be satisfied vacuously by a permutation with
infinitely many k-inversions. (Finiteness is in fact automatic here — see
kInversions_finite_of_isKAffine — but only because of the other
conjuncts.)
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Paper source: Definition 1.3, i.e. part 2 of Conjecture 1.2. Every pair
in the divisor census satisfies ρ(g,r,d) ≥ 0.
This is deliberately an implication and not an equivalence. The converse
inclusion (every pair with ρ ≥ 0 occurs) is part 1 of Conjecture 1.2, which
the paper records as open outside small genus. Building it into the
definition would silently strengthen every hypothesis BrillNoetherGeneral G
and, more importantly, weaken every conclusion of the form
¬ BrillNoetherGeneral G.
Equations
- Bananas.BrillNoetherGeneral G = ∀ (r d : ℤ), 0 ≤ r → Utilities.BNExists G r d → 0 ≤ Utilities.bnNumber G r d
Instances For
Paper source: the set N_(G,u,v) of thm-NonSubmodGenus2 (Theorem 3.4),
for two marks u = v_{α,i}, v = v_{α,j} on one strand:
{ v_{α,q} : q ≠ n_α - i, q ≠ j, j - i ≤ q ≤ j - i + n_α }.
The bounds are stated over ℤ. The paper places no order relation on i
and j, and with truncated ℕ subtraction the constraint j - i ≤ q would
collapse to 0 ≤ q whenever j < i; the ℕ reading therefore only agrees
with the paper's set when i ≤ j.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Paper source: defn:evenlyMarked (Definition 4.14).
Two interior marks on distinct theta strands divide their strands in the same rational ratio. Cross multiplication avoids a division convention.