March 1972 correction (Scott, pp. 135–136) #
Robin Milner observed that Scott's remark before Proposition 2.5 was wrong: a
T₀-topology
on a complete lattice need not have every open set Scott-open. The two extreme
T₀-topologies
inducing the same partial order are generated by
The corrected proofs of Propositions 2.9, 2.10, and 3.3 assume the given topology is contained in the Scott (lattice) topology: every open set of the given topology is Scott-open.
For Proposition 2.10, Scott distinguishes ambient joins in D' from subspace
joins in
a retract D ⊆ D': the prime in ⊔S′ marks the index (join taken in D'), not
a
"primed join" operator. The retraction identity used in the corrected argument is
j(⊔S′) = ⊔S for directed S ⊆ D (see
IsContinuousLatticeRetraction.retr_ambientSSup_eq_sSup
in FunctionSpaces.lean).
Page 136 adds that function spaces pose no subspace/sup mismatch: lubs are computed pointwise, so the product (relativized) topology is contained in the Scott topology once the Milner hypothesis is in place.
Extreme T₀-topologies inducing the order #
Lower subbasic set {x | not x <= y} from Scott's March 1972 correction.
Instances For
Milner hypothesis for 2.9, 2.10, 3.3 #
March 1972 correction. The given topology τ is coarser than (or equal
to) the Scott
topology: every set open in τ is Scott-open. Equivalently Opens(τ) ⊆ Opens(Scott),
i.e. scottTopologicalSpace ≤ τ in mathlib's order on topologies.