Commutator of the bilinear form with a cutoff #
Evans, Partial Differential Equations (2nd ed.), §6.3.1, Theorem 2 differentiates the equation
without cutting off, because his interior H² theorem asks only u ∈ H¹(U). The interior H²
estimate here quantifies its solution over H₀¹(Ω), and ∂_ℓu has no boundary condition, so
the induction runs on ξ·∂_ℓu and pays a commutator.
This file computes it. Each block of Op.fullBilin is expanded on the cut-off element, one
entry at a time, and every term either matches the differentiated equation tested against ξv
or becomes an L² pairing against v.
Principal entry #
∂ᵢ(ξ·∂_ℓu) is (∂ᵢξ)(∂_ℓu) + ξ(∂ᵢ∂_ℓu), so the entry splits in two.
- The term with
ξkeeps its derivative on the solution. Writingξ∂ⱼv = ∂ⱼ(ξv) - (∂ⱼξ)vturns it into the differentiated equation tested againstξv, plus a pairing. - The term with
∂ᵢξkeeps its derivative on the test function, and has to be integrated by parts. It is admissible because∂ᵢξis supported inW, which isEllipticPdes.Regularity.setIntegral_mul_mulTest_partialD.
Nothing here is specific to the operator: the coefficient enters as a bounded measurable weight
and the second derivative of the solution enters as a weak derivative on W. The entries are
supplied as classes with their defining almost-everywhere descriptions, so the caller names its
own and no product is constructed twice.
Main declarations #
mul_eq_self_of_eqOn_one: a cutoff that is one where a weight lives is invisible.setIntegral_principal_entry: one entry of the principal block, expanded.setIntegral_principal_entry_coeff: the same at the operator's coefficient, in the shape the datum pairs against.setIntegral_lower_entry: one entry of a block with no derivative on the test function.setIntegral_blocks_eq: all three blocks, as the shapes the datum names.
Open collar the identifications use #
Open collar around the middle cutoff. There is an open N with
tsupport ξ ⊆ N ⊆ tsupport θ on which θ is identically 1.
Every identification the induction step makes holds only after a cutoff, and N is where the
cutoff is invisible. Running the differentiated equation on N rather than on the compact
tsupport θ is what lets the inductive hypothesis's own family supply every derivative: the
first derivatives it names agree with the ambient element's gradient coordinates almost
everywhere on N, which is enough for both to be weak derivatives of one class there.
Invisibility of a cutoff that is one where the weight lives. Every identification the induction step makes holds only after a cutoff, and every weight it pairs against is supported where that cutoff is identically one, so the cutoff never reaches the conclusion.
One entry of the principal block of the cut-off element. With Uamb an ambient element
whose i-th gradient coordinate is (∂ᵢξ)·p + ξ·(∂ᵢp), the entry
∫_Ω a·(∂ᵢ(ξp))·∂ⱼv splits into the differentiated equation's principal term tested against
ξv, a pairing coming from ξ∂ⱼv = ∂ⱼ(ξv) - (∂ⱼξ)v, and the integration by parts of the term
in which the derivative landed on the cutoff.
Aip is the class of a·p, dAip its weak j-derivative on W, and Aig the class of
a·∂ᵢp. Only dAip needs the coefficient to be differentiable, and it enters as a hypothesis
rather than as a construction, so this statement is free of every coefficient bundle.
One entry of the principal block in the shape the datum pairs against. The general
entry is instantiated at the operator's coefficient, its weak derivative is supplied by the
W^{k,∞} bundle through the Leibniz rule, and the three integrals it returns are split into the
five the datum names.
The first is the differentiated equation's principal term tested against ξv, with the second
derivative in the order the gradient of the cut-off derivative produces it. The other four are
pairings, and each is one of the datum's shapes.
One entry of a block with no derivative on the test function. The transport and
zeroth-order blocks need no integration by parts: the entry is already an L² pairing, and
only the gradient formula and the move down to W are used.
Three blocks of the bilinear form on the cut-off element. Summing the principal entry over both directions and adding the transport and zeroth-order blocks, which need no integration by parts, gives the whole pairing as eight sums, each of them a shape the datum of the induction step names.
The first sum is the differentiated equation's principal term tested against ξv, with the
second derivative in the order the gradient produces it. Everything else is a pairing against
v.