The ErLV reduction at its actual use site #
The global proof uses the majorant diagram only inside the contradiction
branch in which every vertex has degree at least seven. It does not need an
abstract exchange producing a cheaper majorant pair. This file therefore
keeps ErLVCoordinatedMajorantExchangeComplete as the documented stronger
open statement and names the weaker obligation actually needed: an
exceptional jointly minimal pair at the selected maximal-gap vertex is
impossible.
The use-site package keeps only the data consumed by the branch proofs.
All data present where the ErLV diagram is actually invoked: a convex
top-three configuration in the high-minimum-degree contradiction branch, a
maximal-gap vertex x, and the jointly minimal pair selected around x and
x+3.
- convex : CyclicStrictConvex P
- classes : HasTopThreeDistanceClasses P d₁ d₂ d₃
- x : Fin n
Selected vertex with maximal first-neighbor gap.
- pair : CoordinatedK3MajorantPair P d₁ d₂ d₃ (firstClockwiseNeighbor P d₁ d₂ d₃ self.x) self.x (cyclicAdvance self.x 3) (firstCounterclockwiseNeighbor P d₁ d₂ d₃ (cyclicAdvance self.x 3))
Jointly minimal pair of facing majorant paths.
Instances For
Package an actual contradiction-branch use site.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The exceptional branch with inner endpoint move counts (1,2).
Instances For
The exceptional branch with inner endpoint move counts (2,1).
Instances For
The exceptional branch with inner endpoint move counts (2,2).
Instances For
The exact weakened lemma needed at the reduction use site. A direct geometric contradiction is enough; no cheaper pair need be constructed.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The (1,2) exceptional branch is impossible at the use site.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The (2,1) exceptional branch is impossible at the use site.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The (2,2) exceptional branch is impossible at the use site.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The at-use-site obligation is exactly the conjunction of the three rigid branches and nothing stronger.
The old exchange statement implies the narrowed use-site statement, so the pivot weakens the missing obligation rather than changing the theorem.
Killing the three branches directly at the use site supplies the strict inner-endpoint order required by the already-proved nesting geometry.
Use-site branch closure therefore reaches the existing source-facing arc-nesting interface.
Every cover sequence weakly increases squared distance from its starting edge to its terminal edge.
A nonempty cover sequence strictly increases squared distance.
A positive-length majorant path cannot terminate in the smallest of the
three graph ranks. Its terminal edge is d₁ or d₂, but one move alone
does not determine which.
Strict ED on two equal d₃ avoiding sides forces one cross edge into
the top two classes, not merely into the top-three graph.
Exact ED output in case (2,2): the inserted cross edge is d₁ ∨ d₂.
The kernel does not force the d₂ color required to enter the terminal
d₂-cage directly.
Once an exceptional inner-count branch has the missing outer localization, its arithmetic is already in the direct short-arc branch. It does not produce one of the five exceptional rows.
Kernel check against the five-row enumeration: after outer localization,
none of the rigid (1,2)/(2,1)/(2,2) inner-count cases realizes a table row.
The two partitions concern different variables.
The two exact color subcases left at the shared tip in (1,2).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The remaining d₂ terminal color is impossible in the (1,2) branch.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Closing both actual terminal colors would close the (1,2) branch.
The mirror terminal-color split left at the shared tip in (2,1).
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The remaining d₂ terminal color is impossible in the (2,1) branch.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Closing both actual terminal colors would close the (2,1) branch.
Four exact top-two cross-color subcases left in (2,2). The d₂
subcases are the only ones even color-compatible with the terminal d₂
cage; the d₁ subcases require a different full-two-rung adapter.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The zt = d₂ cross-color subcase is impossible in the (2,2) branch.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The xu = d₁ cross-color subcase is impossible in the (2,2) branch.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The xu = d₂ cross-color subcase is impossible in the (2,2) branch.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The strengthened ED theorem reduces (2,2) exactly to the four named
cross-edge/color obligations.
The exact remaining use-site boundary after the rigid branch analysis:
two terminal colors in each shared-tip branch and four cross-edge/color
possibilities in the (2,2) branch. Discharging these eight propositions is
sufficient for the at-the-vertex replacement of the abstract exchange.
The same exact eight-subcase boundary, connected all the way to the source-facing nesting interface used by the global reduction.