Consequences of the polynomial bound #
The filter for a natural number tending to infinity through prime values.
Equations
Instances For
The upper-bound form used in Section 9 of the paper. Together with the
elementary lower bound
hollowConstant p d * (p - 1) + 1 ≤ egzConstant p d and a bound on
hollowConstant p d that is uniform in p for fixed d (Proposition thw
in the paper), this implies the little-o formulation of Theorem 1.2.
Equations
- EGZ.MainUpperBound d = ∀ (ε : ℝ), 0 < ε → ∀ᶠ (p : ℕ) in EGZ.atTopAlongPrimes, ↑(EGZ.egzConstant p d) ≤ (↑(EGZ.hollowConstant p d) + ε) * ↑p
Instances For
The direct little-o formulation of Theorem 1.2.
Equations
- EGZ.MainAsymptotic d = (fun (p : ℕ) => ↑(EGZ.egzConstant p d) - ↑p * ↑(EGZ.hollowConstant p d)) =o[EGZ.atTopAlongPrimes] fun (p : ℕ) => ↑p
Instances For
The polynomial-method bound holds eventually (in fact, pointwise) along the primes.
The explicit lower benchmark furnished by an extremal hollow family.
Equations
- EGZ.elementaryHollowLowerBound p d = EGZ.hollowConstant p d * (p - 1) + 1
Instances For
The elementary hollow-family lower benchmark differs from p * w by
o(p), thanks to the uniform polynomial-method bound on w.
The asymptotic bridge #
The elementary lower bound gives the lower half of the asymptotic squeeze.
Once the paper's upper estimate is available, the elementary lower estimate and the polynomial bound complete Theorem 1.2.