Algebraic bookkeeping for chain insertion #
This file isolates the finite mass calculations in the chain-insertion
proof of Theorem 2.1. The analytic content of the exponential transfer
step is kept separate: once that step supplies the sign of η, the results below identify the new
chain mixture as an upward transfer inside each pair {Cⱼ, Hⱼ}.
Averaged mass placed at the lower state Cⱼ.
Equations
- Feige.insertedLowerMass B w θ j = θ (j + 1) * (B j - B (j + 1)) + Feige.insertionWeight θ j * w j
Instances For
Pairwise expansion of the expectation for the chain whose insertion
rank is J.
Equations
- Feige.insertionPairScore A B w gLower gUpper k J = ∑ j ∈ Finset.range k, (Feige.lowerMassForInsertion B w J j * gLower j + Feige.upperMassForInsertion A J j * gUpper j)
Instances For
The same inserted-chain score indexed by its consecutive chain level:
levels through J are lower states and later levels are upper states.
Equations
- Feige.insertionLevelScore A B w gLower gUpper J r = if r ≤ J then Feige.lowerMassForInsertion B w J r * gLower r else Feige.upperMassForInsertion A J (r - 1) * gUpper (r - 1)
Instances For
The pairwise and consecutive-level expansions of one inserted-chain expectation agree.
The upward mass-transfer coefficient.
Equations
- Feige.insertionTransfer A F θ p j = Feige.insertedUpperMass A θ j - Feige.independentUpperMass F p j
Instances For
Summing the pairwise upward transfers proves the expectation comparison.
The insertion-position weights are nonnegative when θ decreases.
The insertion-position weights telescope from θ 0 to θ k.
Averaging the actual Cⱼ mass over all insertion ranks separates into
the single bridge rank and the strictly later ranks.
Averaging the actual Hⱼ mass over all insertion ranks keeps exactly
the ranks through j.
The total insertion weight through rank j. This is the coefficient
of Aⱼ - Aⱼ₊₁ in the averaged mass at Hⱼ.
The averaged lower-mass formula obtained by separating the insertion
rank J = j from all later ranks.
The full weighted rank average gives the lower-mass formula.
Averaging the complete pairwise scores over insertion ranks gives the averaged lower and upper masses.
A convex average cannot exceed all of its entries. This is the final finite step selecting one insertion position from the averaged chain comparison.
The local transfer identity identifies the insertion coefficient η;
positivity of its four factors gives the upward transfer direction.
The finite mass-transport conclusion of the chain-insertion step.
Once the exponential transfer identity has supplied the required factorized
transfer on every edge, the independently revealed coordinate is dominated
by the averaged inserted-chain law for every payoff which is increasing on
each pair Cⱼ ⊆ Hⱼ. All remaining hypotheses are the corresponding
analytic and probabilistic identities.
Full finite selection step in the chain-insertion argument.
The two equalities hold and haverage are precisely the expansions of
the old hybrid expectation and of the convex average of inserted-chain
expectations. The theorem first applies the upward-transport comparison
and then selects one insertion rank from that convex average.
The finite chain-insertion conclusion with the inserted-chain score
expanded canonically into its Cⱼ/Hⱼ pairs. Unlike
exists_localInsertion_score_of_transfer, this theorem no longer asks for
the averaged-score identity as an external hypothesis.