Indiscernible Sequences for Lω₁ω #
A sequence (aᵢ)_{i ∈ I} in a model M is Lω₁ω-indiscernible if for every
n-variable formula and every two strictly increasing n-tuples from I, the
formula holds on one iff it holds on the other.
Standalone API — does not advance the Hanf boundary.
A sequence a : I → M is Lω₁ω-indiscernible if for every n-variable
formula φ (no free variables) and every two strictly increasing maps
s t : Fin n → I, the formula holds on a ∘ s iff on a ∘ t.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
IsLomega1omegaIndiscernibleOn a Γ is the Γ-restricted form: the
indiscernibility equivalence is required only for formulas whose sigma-pair
lies in Γ ⊆ Σ n, L.BoundedFormulaω Empty n. Strictly weaker than
IsLomega1omegaIndiscernible a (which is the Γ = Set.univ case).
Motivation: the EM pipeline only uses indiscernibility on the countable
family Set.range s for a chosen formula enumeration s, not on all
Lω₁ω formulas. Weakening to the restricted form lets callers supply the
genuinely-needed hypothesis rather than the stronger full indiscernibility.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Restricting an On-indiscernible sequence to a sub-order preserves
restricted indiscernibility on the same family.
Monotonicity: shrinking the formula family preserves restricted indiscernibility.
Restricting an indiscernible sequence to a sub-order.