Documentation

LeanPool.MassFormula.Finiteness

Auxiliary file: sigma_infinite_iff—the finiteness dichotomy of Remark 1° (p.1031) #

sigma K n is infinite exactly when K has equal characteristic p and p divides n ([Serre 1978, Remark 1°, p.1031][Serre1978]). The two directions are separate goals:

References #

The uniform bound behind the finiteness half: when n does not vanish in 𝒪[K], writing v for the valuation of n, every L in sigma K n has c L ≤ n * v. At an Eisenstein generator ξ (exists_eisenstein_generator) the term of index n - 1 of the derivative of g at ξ, the sum of the terms i * a i * ξ ^ (i - 1), is n * ξ ^ (n - 1), of valuation exactly n * v + (n - 1); by orthogonality of the power basis (le_addVal_sum_iff) no other term can cancel it, so that valuation is at most n * v + n - 1—and it is d L (addVal_derivative_eq_d). This is the elementary form of the classical bound d ≤ n - 1 + n * v on the different of a totally ramified extension ([Serre 1979, Chap. III, §6, Prop. 13][Serre1979]), the tame case v = 0 included, with no case split and no different ideal. Public rather than private: at t = 0 it is also the tame half of c_eq_zero_iff.

The finiteness half of Remark 1°, contrapositively: if sigma K n is infinite, then K has equal characteristic and the residue characteristic divides n ([Serre 1978, Remark 1°, p.1031][Serre1978]).

The infinitude half of Remark 1°: in equal characteristic p with p ∣ n, the set sigma K n is infinite ([Serre 1978, Remark 1°, p.1031][Serre1978]).

sigma K n is infinite exactly when K has equal characteristic p and p divides n, assembled from the two halves above ([Serre 1978, Remark 1°, p.1031][Serre1978]).