Gaussian Free Field Assembly #
Defines muGFF m as a ProbabilityMeasure and proves two OS axioms for general Gaussian measures:
- OS0 (alternative via quadratic form): Z[∑ᵢ zᵢJᵢ] = exp(−½ ∑ᵢⱼ zᵢzⱼ⟨Jᵢ,CJⱼ⟩) is entire
(the primary OS0 proof via Hartogs is in
OS.os0Analyticity) - OS2 (Euclidean invariance): Z[gf] = Z[f] when covariance is E(4)-invariant
OS0Alt Namespace #
Alternative proof of OS0 for Gaussian measures via the explicit quadratic form expansion.
The main proof used by OS.Master is in OS.os0Analyticity (holomorphic integral theorem).
Helper lemma for bilinear expansion with finite sums
Assumption: The complex covariance is continuous bilinear
Equations
- CovarianceContinuous dμ_config = ∀ (J K : TestFunctionℂ), Continuous fun (z : ℂ) => SchwingerFunctionℂ₂ dμ_config (z • J) K
Instances For
OS0: Analyticity for Gaussian Measures (OLD PROOF - in OS0Alt namespace) #
The key insight is that for Gaussian measures, the generating functional Z[∑ᵢ zᵢJᵢ] = exp(-½⟨∑ᵢ zᵢJᵢ, C(∑ⱼ zⱼJ⟩) = exp(-½ ∑ᵢⱼ zᵢzⱼ⟨Jᵢ, CJ⟩) is the exponential of a polynomial in the complex variables zᵢ, hence entire.
Note: The primary proof is in OSforGFF.OS.os0Analyticity.
The gjCovBilin declaration.
Equations
- OS0Alt.gjCovBilin dμ_config h_bilinear = LinearMap.mk₂ ℂ (fun (x y : TestFunctionℂ) => SchwingerFunctionℂ₂ dμ_config x y) ⋯ ⋯ ⋯ ⋯
Instances For
OS2: Euclidean Invariance for Translation-Invariant Gaussian Measures #
Euclidean invariance follows if the covariance operator commutes with Euclidean transformations. For translation-invariant measures, this is equivalent to the covariance depending only on differences of spacetime points.
Assumption: The covariance is invariant under Euclidean transformations
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Assumption: The complex covariance is invariant under Euclidean transformations
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Implementation Strategy #
To complete these proofs, we need to:
Complete the Glimm-Jaffe reflection positivity argument:
- Time reflection properly implemented using
QFT.compTimeReflectionfrom DiscreteSymmetry ✓ - Implement
covarianceOperatoras the Riesz representation of the 2-point function - Complete the proof of
glimm_jaffe_exponent_reflection_positive - Show that the 4-term expansion in the exponent has non-negative real part
- Time reflection properly implemented using
Prove key lemmas:
- Schwartz map composition with smooth transformations
- Properties of the bilinear form
distributionPairingℂReal - Continuity and analyticity of exponential functionals
Mathematical insights implemented:
- OS0: Polynomial → exponential → entire function ✓
- OS1: Positive semidefinite covariance → bounded generating functional ✓
- OS2: Covariance commutes with transformations → generating functional invariant ✓
- OS3: Reflection positivity framework following Glimm-Jaffe Theorem 6.2.2 ✓ (structure)
- OS4: Covariance decay → correlation decay ✓
Glimm-Jaffe Theorem 6.2.2 Implementation:
- Defined the key expansion:
glimm_jaffe_exponentcaptures ⟨Fbar - CF', C(Fbar - CF')⟩ - Structured the proof around the exponential form Z[Fbar - CF'] = exp(-½⟨Fbar - CF', C(Fbar - CF')⟩)
- The reflection positivity condition ensures Re⟨Fbar - CF', C(Fbar - CF')⟩ ≥ 0
- This gives |Z[Fbar - CF']| ≤ 1, which is the heart of reflection positivity
- Defined the key expansion:
Connection to existing GFF work:
- Use results from
GFF.leanandGFF2.leanwhere applicable - Translate L2-based proofs to distribution framework
- Leverage the explicit Gaussian form of the generating functional
- Use results from
Note: The main theorem gaussian_satisfies_all_GJ_OS_axioms shows that Gaussian measures
satisfy all the OS axioms under appropriate assumptions on the covariance. The Glimm-Jaffe
approach for OS3 provides the mathematical foundation for reflection positivity in the
Gaussian Free Field context.