Relation norms and Galois–Tukey morphisms #
The definitions and inequalities in the preliminary section of the manuscript.
The direction of a morphism agrees with that section: a morphism from A to B
gives B.norm ≤ A.norm.
A family of responses solving every challenge.
Equations
- A.Dominating s = ∀ (x : A.Challenge), ∃ y ∈ s, A.relates x y
Instances For
The least cardinality of a dominating family.
Equations
- A.norm = sInf {κ : Cardinal.{?u.1} | ∃ (s : Set A.Response), A.Dominating s ∧ Cardinal.mk ↑s = κ}
Instances For
theorem
NonMRR.Relation.exists_dominating_of_norm
(A : Relation)
:
∃ (s : Set A.Response), A.Dominating s ∧ Cardinal.mk ↑s = A.norm
The contravariant challenge map and covariant response map of a morphism.
Pull a target challenge back to the source relation.
Send a source response to the target relation.
Instances For
theorem
NonMRR.Relation.Morphism.dominating_image
{A B : Relation}
(f : A.Morphism B)
{s : Set A.Response}
(hs : A.Dominating s)
:
B.Dominating (f.response '' s)
The second challenge in a sequential composition depends on the first response.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
theorem
NonMRR.Relation.dominating_product
{A B : Relation}
{s : Set A.Response}
{t : Set B.Response}
(hs : A.Dominating s)
(ht : B.Dominating t)
:
(A.sequential B).Dominating (s ×ˢ t)
The upper bound for sequential composition used in the manuscript.
theorem
NonMRR.Relation.norm_le_of_sequential_morphism
{A B C : Relation}
(f : (A.sequential B).Morphism C)
(hB : Cardinal.aleph0 ≤ B.norm)
(hAB : A.norm ≤ B.norm)
:
The purely cardinal final step of the argument.