Sign averaging and two little-Grothendieck bounds #
This file contains an elementary but very useful principle and its two standard
consequences for operators with an ℓ_∞ domain or an ℓ₁ codomain.
Sign averaging #
For finitely many vectors w j (j ∈ J) in an inner product space, the average
of ‖∑_j ε_j w_j‖² over all sign patterns ε ∈ {±1}^J equals ∑_j ‖w_j‖²
(the cross terms cancel). Consequently, if every signed sum has norm at most
M, then
∑_{j ∈ J} ‖w_j‖² ≤ M².
A sign pattern is encoded by a subset S ⊆ J (ε_j = +1 iff j ∈ S); the
corresponding signed sum is signedSum w S J. The averaging identity is
sum_powerset_norm_signedSum_sq, proved by induction on J using the
parallelogram law, and the resulting inequality is
sum_norm_sq_le_sq_of_signedSum_le.
The two consequences #
sum_norm_sq_apply_single_le— forB : ℓ_∞ → HwithHa Hilbert space,∑_j ‖B e_j‖² ≤ ‖B‖². This is the little Grothendieck inequality in the form needed here (with constant1): only the±1-vectors ofℓ_∞, which all have norm1, enter the sign-averaging argument. In Hilbert–Schmidt language:Brestricted to the unit vectors is Hilbert–Schmidt with‖B‖_HS ≤ ‖B‖.sum_norm_sq_row_le— dually, forA : H → ℓ₁with rowsw j, i.e.⟪w j, x⟫ = (A x) j, one has∑_j ‖w_j‖² ≤ ‖A‖². Here the signed sums are bounded using∑_{j ∈ J} |y_j| ≤ ‖y‖₁; this is the little Grothendieck bound for the adjointA' : ℓ_∞ = ℓ₁' → H, but stated without ever forming the adjoint.
Both are stated as bounds on finite partial sums. For the index set ℕ this
makes ∑_j ‖w_j‖² summable (summable_norm_sq_row), recorded at the end
together with the ℓ₂-norm identity norm_sq_eq_tsum_norm_sq.
Signed sums #
signedSum w S J = ∑_{j ∈ J} ε_j w_j, where the sign pattern is given by
the subset S: ε_j = +1 for j ∈ S and ε_j = -1 for j ∉ S.
Instances For
The signed sum over the empty index set is 0.
Adding a new index a ∉ J outside the sign pattern subtracts w a.
Adding a new index a ∉ J inside the sign pattern adds w a.
The averaging identity and the sign-averaging bound #
Sign averaging (identity form). Summing ‖∑_j ε_j w_j‖² over all 2^|J|
sign patterns gives 2^|J| · ∑_{j ∈ J} ‖w_j‖²: the cross terms cancel. The proof
is induction on J, where the two extensions of a sign pattern to a new index
are paired by the parallelogram law.
The scalar field 𝕜 is an explicit argument because it does not occur in the
statement (only the norm does, while the proof uses the inner product).
Sign averaging (inequality form). If every signed sum ∑_j ε_j w_j
(j ∈ J) has norm at most M, then ∑_{j ∈ J} ‖w_j‖² ≤ M². As above, 𝕜 is
explicit since it does not occur in the statement.
Little Grothendieck for an ℓ_∞ domain #
Little Grothendieck inequality for ℓ_∞ → H. For every bounded operator
B from ℓ_∞ into a Hilbert space and every finite set J of indices,
∑_{j ∈ J} ‖B e_j‖² ≤ ‖B‖²; that is, B is Hilbert–Schmidt on the unit vectors
with ‖B‖_HS ≤ ‖B‖.
The dual bound for an ℓ₁ codomain #
Little Grothendieck inequality for H → ℓ₁. If w j are the rows of
A : H → ℓ₁, i.e. ⟪w j, x⟫ = (A x) j for all x, then
∑_{j ∈ J} ‖w j‖² ≤ ‖A‖² for every finite J.
This is the little Grothendieck bound applied to the adjoint of A, which maps
ℓ_∞ = ℓ₁' into H; formulating it via the rows avoids constructing the
adjoint. The signed sums are bounded here by
re ⟪z, z⟫ = re (∑_j ε_j (A z)_j) ≤ ‖A z‖₁ ≤ ‖A‖ ‖z‖.
Summability and the ℓ₂-norm as a sum of squares #
Over the index set ℕ, the row bound makes ∑_j ‖w_j‖² a convergent
series (its partial sums are nonnegative and bounded by ‖A‖²).