The defect lemma #
For points w₁, …, w_N in the closed unit disk,
(∏ ‖wⱼ‖) · ∑ⱼ ‖wⱼ⁻¹ - conj wⱼ‖ ≤ 1 - (∏ ‖wⱼ‖)².
The origin argument uses this to replace the inversion identities 1/zⱼ = conj zⱼ, which hold
only when the points lie on the unit circle, by inequalities valid throughout the disk, at a
cost proportional to 1 - |J|² where J is the product.
The blog post proves it by writing ‖wⱼ‖ = e^{-aⱼ}, computing ‖wⱼ⁻¹ - conj wⱼ‖ = 2 sinh aⱼ,
and reducing to superadditivity of sinh. None of that is needed. Splitting off one point,
D (w ::ₘ t) = P · (r · δ_w) + r · D t, r = ‖w‖, P = ∏ over t,
the pointwise fact r · δ_w ≤ 1 - r² and the inductive hypothesis D t ≤ 1 - P² leave
1 - r²P² - [P(1-r²) + r(1-P²)] = (1-r)(1-P)(1-rP) ≥ 0,
which is immediate for r, P ∈ [0,1].
Points at the origin need no separate treatment. There wⱼ⁻¹ is Lean's junk value 0, but
the pointwise fact is still true — as an inequality rather than an equality — because the
left-hand side carries a factor ‖wⱼ‖. A limiting argument, which the informal proof needs,
is therefore avoided.
Main statements #
Sendov.norm_mul_norm_inv_sub_conj_le: the pointwise fact;Sendov.defect: the lemma.