the proof notes (11′), (14′), (15′): tail margin, integration of the configuration bound,
and the constant F* = 9(3/2 − log 3) + (9/2)(ℓ − W) ≤ −6.
theorem
Zeta32.Analytic.EnergyI.config_bound
{a : ℝ}
(ha : 0 < a)
(hm : massA a = 1)
:
∃ (B : ℝ) (C : ℝ),
∀ (n : ℕ),
1 ≤ n →
∀ (x : Fin (3 * n) → ℝ),
(∏ l : Fin (3 * n), Real.exp (-(3 * ↑n) * Wt |x l|)) * ∏ l : Fin (3 * n), ∏ l' : Fin (3 * n) with l < l', (x l - x l') ^ 2 ≤ Real.exp (9 * ↑n ^ 2 * (ellA a - IA a) + C * ↑n * (Real.log (↑n + 1) + 1)) * ∏ l : Fin (3 * n), Real.exp (-(3 * ↑n) * max 0 (|x l| - B))
Configuration bound: (13′) with ε = (n+1)⁻², combined with 2L − W ≤ ℓ − max(0, |x| − B).
theorem
Zeta32.Analytic.EnergyI.energy_bound_exp
(r : ℚ)
(hH : ∀ (n : ℕ), HeineBound r n)
(hF : FstarInput)
(ε : ℝ)
(hε : 0 < ε)
:
The energy bound in exponential form (unlike a logarithmic form, it does not need Q ≠ 0).