Documentation

LeanPool.BrillNoetherGraphs.Bananas.Basics.BananaSameStrandLemma

The four-alternative same-strand lemma #

This is the invariant form of paper Lemma 3.5 (lem-SameStrand). The paper writes vertex equalities as equalities of strand coordinates. That is false at either multivalent endpoint, because an endpoint has a coordinate on every strand. We state the first three alternatives as physical vertex equalities and the fourth as the existence of one strand containing all three physical vertices.

The argument is needed only in the paper's standing banana range g ≥ 2. That hypothesis is mathematically essential: in genus one every degree-one divisor has rank zero, so the displayed four-alternative claim fails for three suitable points on a cycle.

A physical vertex lies on the normalized strand alpha. Unlike a raw coordinate equality, this treats the two common endpoints invariantly.

Equations
Instances For

    Three physical vertices lie on one common banana strand.

    Equations
    • One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
    Instances For

      A noninterior normalized position is one of the two physical endpoints.

      Either physical endpoint lies on every normalized banana strand.

      A non-reflected pair, expressed invariantly by inequality of physical vertices, has rank zero.

      A raw-coordinate reflected pair has rank one in every banana of genus at least two. The older theorem in SameStrand.lean proves only the theta case; the generic endpoint-pencil rank formula supplies exactly the missing step.

      Corrected Lemma 3.5 (lem-SameStrand).

      If rank(x + y - z) = 0 on a banana of genus at least two, then z equals one of the two positive vertices, the two positive vertices are strand reflections, or the three physical vertices lie on a common strand.

      The paper appends coordinate equalities to the first, second, and fourth alternatives. Those parentheticals are invalid at the common endpoints; the vertex/common-strand formulation here is the faithful invariant claim.