Counting the endpoint inversion block #
This file turns the decreasing block supplied by EndpointBlock into the
corresponding lower bound on the number of affine inversion classes, and
assembles the resulting quadratic-versus-linear contradiction that rules out
k-general transmission for the endpoint marking.
TeX labels: lem-TriangleInversionII (Lemma 4.20),
prop-TriangleInversionNumber (Proposition 4.21).
With (u,v) = (v_{0,0}, v_{0,n_0}) and D = g·v_{0,n_0}, the transmission
permutation contains the decreasing block τ(b) = g - b for 0 ≤ b ≤ g,
yielding M ≥ choose (g+1) 2 inversion classes. The ∃ D τ form is the
formal reading of the paper's M, the maximum over all divisors.
Only hk.1 (a torsion witness) is used; IsTorsionOrder is kept because
the paper's M and inv_k refer to the torsion order.
The period conclusion used in Proposition 4.19 is already forced by the endpoint transmission block, before counting its inversions.
TeX labels: thm:bananas (Theorem 1.17) / cor:bananasWithKGT
(Corollary 6.4), endpoint-marking branch, unconditional.
For every genus at least two, the endpoint-marked banana (B, v_0, v_{n})
admits k-general transmission for no k at all.
The proof is an assembly of results that were already present separately.
Suppose KGeneralTransmission (mark B v_0 v_n) k. Then
- all divisors are submodular (second conjunct of Definition 1.10), and by
banana_kGeneral_isTorsionOrder(lem:kgtImpliesTorsionOrder, Lemma 4.2)kis the exact torsion order; - so
endpoint_marked_inversion_lower_bound(lem-TriangleInversionII4.20 /prop-TriangleInversionNumber4.21) supplies a divisorDwhose transmission permutation has at leastchoose (g+1) 2inversion classes; - the third conjunct of Definition 1.10 supplies, for that same
D, a transmission permutation with at mostgenus = ginversion classes; - transmission permutations are unique (
transmissionPermutation_unique), so these are the same permutation, givingchoose (g+1) 2 ≤ g, false forg ≥ 2.
The quadratic-versus-linear gap is exactly the paper's argument; the only
ingredient that had to be added was uniqueness, which is immediate from
def-tauD (Definition 2.11).