Genus-two transmission inversions #
This file begins the formalization of paper Lemma lem:invtau (Lemma 4.10).
The first ingredient is the paper's pointwise construction: a rank-zero,
degree-one twist determines a unique inversion crossing the corresponding
row and column of the transmission permutation.
The same k-inversion classes, represented by putting the second
coordinate in the fundamental period. The proof of Lemma 4.10 sums the
inversion rows in precisely this normalization. We retain the original
kInversions definition (which normalizes the first coordinate) for the
public K-general-transmission contract.
Equations
Instances For
The effective degree-one members of the finite torsion orbit of D.
This is the concrete Fin k model for the paper's set of effective classes
in T_D^1.
Equations
Instances For
Translate a finite torsion index by a fixed index, retaining its integer Euclidean representative in the half-open fundamental period.
Equations
- Bananas.residueShift k b c = b - c
Instances For
Translating finite residue indices is injective.
Every member of the finite twist family has degree one.
Rebase a degree-one twist family at any one of its representatives.
Rebased twists may be reduced to their Euclidean residue at a torsion period.
Effectiveness of a finite degree-one twist transfers to the corresponding residue twist at any chosen vertex representative.
On a genus-two banana, every degree-one divisor of nonnegative rank has rank exactly zero. This lets the effective degree-one twists in Lemma 4.10 feed directly into the unique-crossing construction below.
Effective degree-one torsion residues on a theta graph have rank zero.
Nonrecurrence bounds the number of effective degree-one classes in a finite exact torsion orbit by two. This is the main term estimate in the genus-two inversion formula.
A rank-zero degree-one twist on a connected genus-two graph determines a
unique inversion crossing its transmission corner. More explicitly, if
X = D + a*u - b*v, there is a unique pair (m,n) with
m < b ≤ n and τ(m) > a ≥ τ(n).
This is the pointwise construction used at the start of the proof of paper
Lemma lem:invtau (Lemma 4.10). The two singleton sets are respectively
the northwest and southeast quadrants at (a+1,b); Riemann--Roch makes both
cardinalities equal to one.
The pair produced by
degree_one_rank_zero_twist_unique_crossing_inversion is, in particular, an
ordinary inversion of the transmission permutation.
Crossing-inversion inequalities are equivariant under an affine period.
Together with uniqueness of the crossing inversion, this is the descent of
the pointwise twist construction to period-k inversion classes.
Every ordinary inversion of a positive-period affine permutation has its
unique simultaneous period translate whose first coordinate lies in the
fundamental range used by kInversions.
Every ordinary inversion of a positive-period affine permutation also has its unique simultaneous period translate whose second coordinate lies in the fundamental range. This is the normalization used in the double-sum proof of Lemma 4.10.