Large-period general transmission implies Brill--Noether generality #
This is Proposition 6.1 (prop:kgt-bngenl) of the paper. The paper writes
the threshold as k ≥ g / 2 + 1. For natural-number parameters its exact,
parity-independent form is g + 2 ≤ 2 * k.
The proof separates the graph theory from the combinatorics. The two rank
formulas of lem:tauChars identify a rectangular family of crossing
inversions. If that family has more than g members, two normalize to the
same k-inversion. The interval between those representatives then supplies
at least 2k - 1 distinct k-inversions, contradicting the defining bound.
The rectangular family of inversions crossing both coordinate axes.
Equations
- Bananas.crossingInversions τ = northwestSet τ 1 0 ×ˢ southeastSet τ 1 0
Instances For
Pigeonhole step in Proposition 6.1: too many crossing inversions give two
distinct ordinary inversions representing the same k-inversion.
The combinatorial core of Proposition 6.1. Two different axis-crossing
inversions in one affine-equivalence class force a block of at least 2k-1
different classes.
Paper Proposition 6.1 (prop:kgt-bngenl), with the corrected natural
threshold g + 2 ≤ 2k.
The paper's standing convention is that graphs are connected; it is explicit
here because CFGraph itself does not bundle connectedness.
TeX label: none (Remark 1.18 is unlabeled); the same deduction is the last
step of cor:bananasWithKGT (Corollary 6.4).
Every banana of genus at least three is not Brill--Noether general: its
endpoint pencil has degree two and rank one although its Brill--Noether number
is 2 - g < 0. This formalizes the final observation in the introduction.