Composition of the small-data regularity theorem #
This module writes the proof of thm:A once, in the order of the manuscript,
as a family of statements each of which assumes one remaining display.
The theorem does not go through this file: it is proved by
CKN.Core.Endgame.epsilonRegularityL3_of_instance_slots_q, whose proof is
the same composition with the pressure-gradient hypothesis narrowed to the
two exponent-radius triples that thm:A actually consumes. Read this file
for the shape of the argument and that one for what is checked.
epsilonRegularityL3_closer_of_pending_inputs is that shape. Reading its
proof against the manuscript:
thetaDecay_T_of_inputsiseq:theta-decay-2, and fixesκ,η,Λ₀ofconv:kappa.theoremA_initial_uniform_of_displaysis the start lemmalem:thmA-starttogether with Steps 1 and 2 of the proof ofthm:A: the scale iterationprop:iterationat every centre ofQ_{3/4}, givingeq:thmA-morrey, and the one-sided Morrey transfer onto the cylinder of radius11/16, givingeq:step2-morreyfor the velocity and its gradient. The manuscript states the transfer onQ₂^♯of radius5/8; the larger radius is proved here because the bootstrap round ofprop:bootstrapconsumes the outer cylinder and produces the inner one. The pressure Morrey norm ofeq:step2-morreyis available from the same transfer and is not needed downstream, exactly as in the manuscript.exists_uniform_bootstrap_of_initial_pressureisprop:bootstrapatτ = τ₂ = 25/3, with the sources split att = 0as in Step 3, taking the velocity from𝓜^{3,25/3}on radius11/16to𝓜^{3,25}on radius5/8. This is the single round ofcor:one-round.exists_uniform_halfCylinder_of_final_pressureisthm:endgameon the one-sided cylinder, again with the sources split att = 0. It consumes the velocity in both𝓜^{3,25}and𝓜^{3,25/3}, and produces the Hölder representative ofthm:Awith exponentγ₀ = min {2 - 5/q, 1/5}ofeq:gamma-value.- The hypothesis
hGAislem:pressure-gradient-morrey, asked for at the two triples(τ, R₀, R₁) = (25/3, 11/16, 43/64)and(25, 5/8, 19/32). Its Morrey exponentmin ((1/τ + 8/25)⁻¹) qofeq:pressure-gradient-morreyis25/11at the first triple andmin {q, 25/9}at the second.
The carrier of the pressure gradient is the backward cylinder about the
origin rather than a symmetric parabolic ball: the only containment thm:A
supplies is closure (parabolicCylinder 0 0 1) ⊆ spaceTimeSet Ω I, and a
symmetric ball about any point of that set contains times after it.
The numerical majorant is oneSidedPressureGradientKPAffine, and all
numerical constants are fixed before the solution fields.
The small-data conclusion thm:A from the two remaining pressure
displays. The oscillation display eq:lin35-force and the localized heat
representation of lem:local-equation are discharged by their
suitable-weak-solution theorems.
The same conclusion from the two displays in the shape their own arguments
produce them: the almost-every-time slice certificate of ext:CZ and the
explicit-majorant form of prop:bootstrap.
The exact conclusion of thm:A from two displays. The cylinder
constant of ext:CZ is fixed to the value the slice transfer produces, so the
only data preceding the solution are the force exponent and the slice constant
of ext:CZ, and the only assumptions are the almost-every-time slice
certificate of ext:CZ and the explicit-majorant display prop:bootstrap.
Apart from those two, this is the statement of thm:A verbatim.
Reduction to pressure-gradient and bootstrap estimates. The
pressure-gradient input is reduced to the origin-cell estimate of
prop:bootstrap, and the pressure input to the almost-every-time slice
certificate of ext:CZ; the cylinder constant is fixed by the slice transfer.
Everything else in thm:A is proved.
thm:A from the one-sided pressure-gradient display alone. With the
Calderón--Zygmund estimate ext:CZ supplied at solution level, the oscillation
display eq:lin35-force of prop:lin34 supplied by its own theorem, and the
localized heat representation of lem:local-equation supplied by its own
theorem, the explicit-majorant form of prop:bootstrap is the only remaining
assumption. Apart from it, this is the statement of thm:A verbatim.
thm:A from the origin-cell estimate of prop:bootstrap alone. This
is the deepest reduction available: every other display used by the small-data
argument is proved, and the single assumption is the Morrey-cell bound for the
selected pressure gradient on the one-sided cylinder.
The carrier Morrey norms of a measurable field bound its clipped slice integrals on every cell.
The concrete temporal remainder and the full-sum comparison give the pressure-gradient bound with the enlarged numerical constant.
The small-data regularity conclusion from the full-sum comparison, with the temporal remainder and carrier time estimates supplied by suitability.