The challenge and response maps #
This file proves the reduction from concrete finite block catalogues to slaloms. The analytic hypotheses are precisely the conclusions of the finite construction; they do not assume an inequality between cardinal characteristics.
The concrete finite block data needed by the construction, for every g.
The disjoint finite coordinate block at each stage.
The balanced vectors supported on the stage blocks.
Instances For
The exceptional-value slalom assigned to a growth function and a permutation.
Instances For
A property used to select the genuine challenge or a fixed fallback challenge.
Equations
- C.CandidateGood e g = (Filter.Tendsto (NonMRR.partialSum (C.candidate e g)) Filter.atTop (nhds 0) ∧ ¬Summable fun (i : ℕ) => |C.candidate e g i|)
Instances For
The fallback ensures that the challenge map is defined even for bad choices of g.
Equations
- C.challengeSeries e g = if h : C.CandidateGood e g then { term := C.candidate e g, sum := 0, converges := ⋯, not_absolute := ⋯ } else Classical.choice NonMRR.conditionalSeries_nonempty
Instances For
Eventual avoidance gives the required common zero-sum witness.
The central implication in the morphism: a rearrangement forces infinitely many catches by its exceptional-value slalom.
Images of an unbounded family and a rearranging family dominate the slalom relation.
The cardinal bound before applying the classical inequality b ≤ rr.