Derivation of the Vlasov equation from N-particle Hamiltonian dynamics #
Formalization of the companion paper (vlasov.tex). This file develops the
mean-field theory of the Vlasov equation:
- the N-particle mean-field Hamiltonian and Newton equations of motion;
- the empirical measure of a configuration and its weak (distributional) evolution along Newton trajectories;
- the distributional Vlasov equation and its Lagrangian (characteristic-flow) formulation;
- the Kantorovich–Rubinstein convolution estimate and the Dobrushin Wasserstein-1 stability estimate;
- the mean-field limit theorem: the empirical measures of the N-particle system converge in W₁ to the Vlasov solution as N → ∞.
(tex: …) labels cross-reference the companion LaTeX paper.
Basic type aliases and notation #
Throughout, d : ℕ is the spatial dimension and N : ℕ is the number of particles.
Phase space for a single particle is EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin d) × EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin d).
§1 Equation (Hamiltonian) (tex: eq:HN) #
(tex: eq:HN) The mean-field Hamiltonian for N identical unit-mass particles in ℝ^d:
H_N(X, V) = Σ_{i=1}^{N} |v_i|² / 2 + (1/N) Σ_{1 ≤ i < j ≤ N} W(x_i − x_j).
The factor 1/N normalises the interaction energy so that kinetic and potential energies are of the same order as N → ∞.
Equations
Instances For
§2 Equation (Hamilton / Newton equations of motion) (tex: eq:newton) #
(tex: eq:newton) Predicate asserting that a curve (X, V) : ℝ → (Fin N → PhysSpace d)² satisfies the N-particle mean-field Newton equations
x'_i = v_i, v'i = −(1/N) Σ{j ≠ i} ∇W(x_i − x_j), i = 1, …, N.
gradW is the gradient ∇W : ℝ^d → ℝ^d of the pair potential.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
§3 Assumption (tex: ass:W) #
(tex: ass:W) Standing assumption on the pair potential W : ℝ^d → ℝ.
W belongs to C^{1,1}(ℝ^d): it is differentiable with a globally Lipschitz gradient. Additionally W is even: W(−x) = W(x) for all x. The Lipschitz constant L := Lip(∇W) is finite.
- differentiable : Differentiable ℝ W
W is continuously differentiable.
W is even.
- lipschitzGrad : ∃ (L : NNReal), LipschitzWith L fun (x : PhysSpace d) => fderiv ℝ W x
The gradient ∇W is Lipschitz with some constant L ≥ 0.
Instances
(tex: ass:W2)
Strengthened standing assumption for the weak ⟹ Lagrangian bridge: AssW (so W ∈ C^{1,1},
i.e. ∇W globally Lipschitz, and W even) together with ∇W ∈ C¹ (so W ∈ C²).
The extra gradContDiff field is stated on fun x => fderiv ℝ W x — the same object as
AssW.lipschitzGrad — so the C^{1,1} (Lipschitz) and C² (continuously differentiable)
facts concern one map. This is what makes the Vlasov phase-space field C¹ in space, which the
characteristic flow's C¹ dependence on its initial point (the variational equation) requires.
Only the weak ⟹ Lagrangian bridge (LeanPool/Vlasov/OT/WeakToLagrangian.lean) carries AssW2; the
marquee vlasovWellPosedness / dobrushin stay at the weaker AssW (arbitrary Lipschitz
constant).
- lipschitzGrad : ∃ (L : NNReal), LipschitzWith L fun (x : PhysSpace d) => fderiv ℝ W x
∇W is continuously differentiable (equivalently
W ∈ C²).
Instances
Helper: under [AssW W] (even + differentiable), the gradient of W
at the origin vanishes.
Mathematical content: differentiating W(-x) = W(x) at x = 0 and using
HasFDerivAt.unique gives fderiv W 0 = -fderiv W 0, hence
gradient W 0 = -gradient W 0. In the real vector space EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin d)
this forces gradient W 0 = 0.
Used by empiricalMeasureSolvesVlasov (cor:empirical-vlasov) to kill the
diagonal correction term in weakEvolutionEmpiricalMeasure.
§4 Definition (Empirical measure) (tex: def:empirical) #
(tex: def:empirical) The empirical measure of a configuration (X, V) ∈ (ℝ^d × ℝ^d)^N:
μ^N[X, V] := (1/N) Σ_{i=1}^{N} δ_{(X_i, V_i)}.
Returns a MeasureTheory.Measure (PhaseSpace d). It is a probability measure
when N ≥ 1.
Equations
- Vlasov.empiricalMeasure N X V = (1 / ↑N) • ∑ i : Fin N, MeasureTheory.Measure.dirac (X i, V i)
Instances For
(tex: def:empirical) When N ≥ 1 the empirical measure is a probability measure.
Proof: μ(univ) = (1/N) · Σᵢ δ_{zᵢ}(univ) = (1/N) · N · 1 = 1, where each
Dirac mass evaluates to 1 on the universal set via the
Measure.dirac.isProbabilityMeasure instance.
(tex: def:empirical) The time-dependent empirical measure μ_t^N along a solution of eq:newton.
Equations
- Vlasov.empiricalMeasureCurve N X V t = Vlasov.empiricalMeasure N (X t) (V t)
Instances For
§5 Proposition (Weak evolution of the empirical measure) (tex: prop:weak) #
Convolution of a function k : ℝ^d → ℝ^d with a (finite) measure ρ on ℝ^d: (k * ρ)(x) := ∫ k(x − y) dρ(y).
Equations
- Vlasov.convolveFunctionMeasure k ρ x = ∫ (y : Vlasov.PhysSpace d), k (x - y) ∂ρ
Instances For
Spatial marginal of a measure on phase space.
Equations
Instances For
The integral of a function φ against the empirical measure empiricalMeasure N X V
equals (1/N) * ∑ i, φ(X i, V i), by unfolding the weighted sum of Dirac masses.
For a smooth test function φ, the chain rule gives: the map t ↦ φ(X t i, V t i) has
derivative ⟨V t i, gradXφ (X t i, V t i)⟩ + ⟨a t i, gradVφ (X t i, V t i)⟩ at t,
where a t i is the acceleration vector at particle i and time t.
φ's Fréchet derivative is an input hypothesis hφ_fderiv rather than derived
inside the helper, keeping the body a straight composition:
· HasDerivAt.prodMk hX hV gives the curve derivative t ↦ (X t i, V t i).
· (hφ_fderiv (X t i, V t i)).comp_hasDerivAt composes through φ.
· Unfolding gradXφ/gradVφ via hgradXφ/hgradVφ and rewriting the
Fréchet derivative's action via inner-product partial-derivative
identities gives the target inner-product form.
The derivative of t ↦ ∫ φ d(empiricalMeasureCurve N X V t) equals the finite sum
expression (1/N) * Σᵢ [⟨V t i, gradXφ (X t i, V t i)⟩ + ⟨aᵢ, gradVφ (X t i, V t i)⟩]
where aᵢ = -(1/N) Σ_{j≠i} gradW(X t i - X t j) is the Newton acceleration,
obtained by combining empiricalMeasure_integral_eq and hasDerivAt_phi_along_trajectory
with HasDerivAt.sum and HasDerivAt.const_smul.
Convolution of the kernel gradW against the spatial marginal ofthe
empirical measure unfolds to the explicit finite sum
(1/N) • Σⱼ gradW(X t i − X t j). This separates the measure-pushforward /
Dirac-integration machinery from the algebraic "add and subtract the diagonal"
step in diagonalCorrection_eq.
Proof strategy:
empiricalMeasureCurveandempiricalMeasureunfold to(1/N : ℝ≥0∞) • Σⱼ Measure.dirac (X t j, V t j).Measure.map_smul(MeasureTheory/Measure/Map.lean:127) pushesProd.fstthrough the scalar.Measure.map_add(MeasureTheory/Measure/Map.lean:103) + finset induction distributesProd.fstover the sum, giving(1/N : ℝ≥0∞) • Σⱼ Measure.dirac (X t j).convolveFunctionMeasureunfolds to∫ y, gradW(X t i − y) ∂ρ.integral_smul_measure(Bochner) extracts the(1/N).toReal = 1/Nscalar;integral_finsetSum_measure(Integral/Bochner/Basic.lean) distributes integration over the finite sum of Diracs;integral_dirac'(Integral/Bochner/Basic.lean) collapses each summand togradW(X t i − X t j).
The remainder term r in the weak evolution identity equals
(1/N²) * Σᵢ ⟨gradW 0, gradVφ(X t i, V t i)⟩: this is the diagonal correction
obtained when extending the Newton-equation sum Σ_{j≠i} to all j (the diagonal
j = i summand contributes gradW(X t i - X t i) = gradW 0).
This lemma is pure inner-product algebra atop
convolveFunctionMeasure_empiricalSpatial_eq: extend Σ_{j≠i} to Σⱼ via
Finset.sum_ite_ne or Finset.sum_compl_add_sum, distribute the inner
product with inner_sub_left/inner_smul_left, recognise the
(1/N) • Σⱼ gradW factor as the convolveFunctionMeasure unfolding.
The remainder bound: for the diagonal correction r = (1/N²) * Σᵢ⟨gradW 0, gradVφ(zᵢ)⟩,
we have |r| ≤ (1/N) * (⨆ x, ‖gradW x‖) * (⨆ z, ‖gradVφ z‖), using
abs_inner_le_norm on each summand and the fact that the sum has N terms.
The two BddAbove hypotheses are essential: ciSup over an unbounded
function returns junk value 0 on ℝ, which would make the inequality
false in the unbounded case. The .tex's ‖∇W‖_∞ ‖∇_v φ‖_∞ implicitly
assumes L^∞ boundedness; making it explicit here keeps the lemma
honest. (For gradVφ: it comes from ∇_v φ of a smooth compactly
supported φ, so the bound is a consequence of HasCompactSupport
— but expressing that derivation requires Mathlib API that's awkward
to assemble; easier to pass the bound as a hypothesis.)
Derivative-identity core of prop:weak, without the L^∞ boundedness
hypotheses. Along a Newton solution the map t ↦ ⟨μ_t^N, φ⟩ is
differentiable, with derivative the Vlasov pairing plus the explicit diagonal
correction (1/N²) Σᵢ ⟨∇W(0), ∇_v φ(zᵢ)⟩. The BddAbove hypotheses of
weakEvolutionEmpiricalMeasure feed only its quantitative
(1/N)‖∇W‖_∞‖∇_vφ‖_∞ bound conjunct, not this identity — keeping them out
here is what lets empiricalMeasureSolvesVlasov (and the packaged
empiricalMeasure_isVlasovSolution) run hypothesis-free beyond ass:W.
(tex: prop:weak) Weak evolution of the empirical measure.
Let (X, V) : [0, T] → (ℝ^d × ℝ^d)^N solve the Newton equations eq:newton, and let ρ_t^N be the spatial marginal of the empirical measure μ_t^N. Then for every test function φ ∈ C_c^∞(ℝ^d × ℝ^d) and every time t, there is a real remainder r = R_N(t) such that
d/dt ⟨μ_t^N, φ⟩ = ⟨μ_t^N, v · ∇_x φ − (∇W * ρ_t^N) · ∇_v φ⟩ + r,
with |r| ≤ (1/N) ‖∇W‖_∞ ‖∇v φ‖∞. Concretely, r is the diagonal correction
+(1/N²) Σᵢ ∇W(0) · ∇v φ(xᵢ, vᵢ). (The positive sign arises because extending
the Newton-equation sum Σ{j≠i} to Σ_j subtracts the j=i term gradW(0),
which then gets multiplied by the outer −(1/N) acceleration coefficient,
yielding +(1/N²)·gradW(0)·gradVφ.) Under Assumption ass:W (W even ⟹
∇W(0) = 0) the diagonal vanishes and r = 0; that strengthening is the
content of empiricalMeasureSolvesVlasov below.
The remainder is quantified existentially because HasDerivAt has a
unique derivative — a free R_N parameter would make the statement
false.
§6 Equation (Weak form of empirical-measure evolution) (tex: eq:weak-eq) #
(tex: eq:weak-eq) The distributional evolution identity for the empirical measure (the content of Proposition prop:weak):
d/dt ⟨μ_t^N, φ⟩ = ⟨μ_t^N, v · ∇_x φ − (∇W * ρ_t^N) · ∇_v φ⟩ + R_N(t),
for every φ ∈ C_c^∞(ℝ^d × ℝ^d), with |R_N(t)| ≤ (1/N) ‖∇W‖_∞ ‖∇v φ‖∞.
This is a Prop-valued definition packaging the statement of eq:weak-eq.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
§7 Corollary (Empirical measure solves Vlasov) (tex: cor:empirical-vlasov) #
(tex: cor:empirical-vlasov) Under Assumption ass:W, the empirical measure μ_t^N satisfies the distributional Vlasov equation eq:vlasov with remainder R_N ≡ 0: for every φ ∈ C_c^∞(ℝ^d × ℝ^d),
d/dt ⟨μ_t^N, φ⟩ = ⟨μ_t^N, v · ∇_x φ − (∇W * ρ_t^N) · ∇_v φ⟩.
§8 Equation (Vlasov equation) (tex: eq:vlasov) #
(tex: eq:vlasov) The nonlinear Vlasov equation for a curve of probability measures f_t on ℝ^d × ℝ^d:
∂_t f + v · ∇_x f − (∇W * ρ_t)(x) · ∇_v f = 0, ρ_t(x) = ∫ f_t(x, dv).
We encode this as the distributional statement: for every φ ∈ C_c^∞(ℝ^d × ℝ^d) the map t ↦ ∫ φ df_t satisfies
d/dt ∫ φ df_t = ∫ [v · ∇_x φ − (∇W * ρ_t)(x) · ∇_v φ] df_t.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
(tex: cor:empirical-vlasov, packaged)
The empirical measure curve of a global Newton solution is a global
(two-sided) weak Vlasov solution — empiricalMeasureSolvesVlasov quantified
over the full C_c^∞ test class of IsVlasovSolution, with no hypotheses
beyond ass:W. Together with empiricalMeasureCurve_hasFiniteFirstMoment
this discharges the weak-PDE and moment sides of the solution predicates on
empirical curves; the remaining gap to the IsLagrangianVlasovSolution that
dobrushin consumes is the characteristic-flow witness (the linear flow of
the empirical field, with atoms following characteristics), which is not yet
formalized.
§9 Theorem (Existence and uniqueness for Vlasov) (tex: thm:vlasov-wp) #
Predicate: μ is a probability measure on PhaseSpace d with finite first moment.
Equations
- Vlasov.HasFiniteFirstMoment μ = (MeasureTheory.IsProbabilityMeasure μ ∧ MeasureTheory.Integrable (fun (z : Vlasov.PhaseSpace d) => ‖z‖) μ)
Instances For
Empirical measures lie in 𝒫₁: probability (for N ≥ 1) plus finite
first moment — the latter because integration against a finite weighted sum
of Dirac masses is a finite sum. Discharges, pointwise in time, the moment
hypotheses that the Dobrushin-type estimates place on empirical curves.
Curve version of empiricalMeasure_hasFiniteFirstMoment: the empirical
measure of a particle configuration lies in 𝒫₁ at every time.
§10 Equation (Characteristic / mean-field ODE) (tex: eq:char) #
(tex: eq:char) Predicate asserting that (charX, charV) : ℝ → PhaseSpace d → PhysSpace d × PhysSpace d is the characteristic flow associated to a given curve of spatial marginal measures ρ : ℝ → Measure (PhysSpace d) and pair-potential gradient gradW:
X'(t, z) = V(t, z), V'(t, z) = −(∇W * ρ_t)(X(t, z)), (X, V)(0, z) = z.
The self-consistent condition (ρ_t is the pushforward of f_0 under X(t, ·)) is
captured by IsCharacteristicFlowSelfConsistent.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
(tex: eq:char) The self-consistency condition: the spatial marginal ρ_t equals the pushforward of the initial spatial marginal f₀_x under the position map X(t, ·).
Equations
- Vlasov.IsCharacteristicFlowSelfConsistent charX f₀ ρ = ∀ (t : ℝ), ρ t = MeasureTheory.Measure.map (fun (z : Vlasov.PhaseSpace d) => charX t z) f₀
Instances For
(tex: eq:char) The Vlasov solution f_t is the pushforward of f_0 under the characteristic map (X(t,·), V(t,·)).
Equations
- Vlasov.vlasovSolutionViaPushforward charX charV f₀ t = MeasureTheory.Measure.map (fun (z : Vlasov.PhaseSpace d) => (charX t z, charV t z)) f₀
Instances For
A Vlasov solution with an explicit characteristic-flow representation.
Strictly stronger than IsVlasovSolution: every IsLagrangianVlasovSolution
satisfies the weak PDE AND admits a global characteristic flow (charX, charV)
such that f t = (charX t, charV t)_# (f 0) for every t.
This is the regularity level at which the dynamic-continuity / Lipschitz-on-
flow / dominated-convergence-on-trajectory arguments (upper semicontinuity of
W₁ under narrow convergence, the derivative bound feeding Gronwall, narrow
continuity in the KR-dual formulation) compose cleanly — these all need the
flow witness, which the abstract IsVlasovSolution does not carry.
Producers:
vlasovSolutionViaPushforward_isLagrangianVlasovSolution(LeanPool/Vlasov/OT/CharacteristicFlow.lean) — takes the flow as a hypothesis, and the pushforward equation holds byvlasovSolutionViaPushforward's definition.vlasovWellPosednessproduces the per-window familyIsLagrangianVlasovSolutionOn gradW f Tfor every horizonT > 0(not this global predicate — the flow witnesses may differ per window) from a Banach fixed-point construction on spatial marginals; the characteristic flow falls out of the existence proof, so the windowed Lagrangian conclusion costs no extra infrastructure.
IsLagrangianVlasovSolution gradW f → IsVlasovSolution gradW f by .1.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
§11 Theorem (Dobrushin, 1979) (tex: thm:dobrushin) #
Completeness of (𝒫_1(PhysSpace d), W₁) for Polish spaces.
A Cauchy sequence in W₁ with a uniform first-moment bound has a W₁-limit in
𝒫_1. The proof routes through Prokhorov + tightness from the moment bound
- narrow-to-W₁ upgrade under moment control.
Used to lift the Picard iteration's Cauchy sequence (from the
Phi_supW1_contraction contraction estimate) to a W₁-limit in the curve
space; the limit is a fixed point of the Picard iteration, yielding a
self-consistent characteristic flow + Vlasov solution on [0, T₀].
Note on finiteness in the convolution Lipschitz cascade #
convolveLipschitz_KR_le, convolveLipschitz_inner_bound, and
norm_convolveFunctionMeasure_sub_le conclude in .toReal of an ENNReal
expression involving wasserstein1 ρ σ. The inequality requires a finiteness
hypothesis wasserstein1 ρ σ ≠ ⊤: without it (⊤ : ℝ≥0∞).toReal = 0 would
collapse any positive LHS bound. The hypothesis is threaded through the
cascade and discharged at the Dobrushin call site from HasFiniteFirstMoment
via wasserstein1_lt_top_of_finite_moment. See formalize/DESIGN.md (in the source repository).
For fixed x : PhysSpace d and v : PhysSpace d, the function
y ↦ @inner ℝ (PhysSpace d) _ (gradW (x - y)) v is LipschitzWith (L * ‖v‖₊).
Proof: the map y ↦ gradW (x - y) is L-Lipschitz (composition of the L-Lipschitz gradW
with the 1-Lipschitz subtraction y ↦ x - y), and w ↦ ⟨w, v⟩ is ‖v‖₊-Lipschitz
(bounded linear map with operator norm ‖v‖); compose via LipschitzWith.comp.
For any 1-Lipschitz function φ : PhysSpace d → ℝ, the integral difference
∫ φ dρ − ∫ φ dσ ≤ (wasserstein1 ρ σ).toReal.
This follows directly from the Kantorovich–Rubinstein definition of wasserstein1 as the
supremum of integral differences over 1-Lipschitz test functions, together with
ENNReal.toReal_iSup and ENNReal.ofReal_toReal to convert between ENNReal and ℝ.
For any v : PhysSpace d with ‖v‖ ≤ 1, the real inner product
⟨(∇W∗ρ)(x) − (∇W∗σ)(x), v⟩ is bounded by (L : ℝ) * (wasserstein1 ρ σ).toReal.
Proof: unfold convolveFunctionMeasure to expose ∫ gradW(x−y) dρ and ∫ gradW(x−y) dσ;
commute the inner product ⟨·, v⟩ (a continuous linear map) through each integral via
ContinuousLinearMap.integral_comp_comm; then the integrand function
y ↦ ⟨gradW(x−y), v⟩ has Lipschitz constant L * ‖v‖ ≤ L
(from convolveLipschitz_inner_lipschitz), so (1/L) * (that integrand) is 1-Lipschitz and
convolveLipschitz_KR_le closes the estimate.
For z : PhysSpace d and C : ℝ, if every unit vector v (with ‖v‖ ≤ 1) satisfies
@inner ℝ (PhysSpace d) _ z v ≤ C, then ‖z‖ ≤ C.
Proof: in the z = 0 case, ‖0‖ = 0 ≤ C (from C ≥ ⟨0, 0⟩ = 0); in the z ≠ 0 case,
take v = z / ‖z‖ (which satisfies ‖v‖ = 1); then
‖z‖ = ⟨z, z/‖z‖⟩ = ⟨z, v⟩ ≤ C by hypothesis via real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm.
W₁-continuity of the integral against a Lagrangian Vlasov solution.
Uses the enriched IsLagrangianVlasovSolution predicate (carrying the
characteristic flow), which makes the proof structurally clean: by the
pushforward equation f t = Measure.map (charX t, charV t) (f 0) and
integral_map, ∫ φ d(f t) = ∫ (φ ∘ (charX t, charV t)) d(f 0). Continuity
in t then reduces to dominated convergence on the fixed measure f 0,
with pointwise continuity from the flow's HasDerivAt and an integrable
dominator from HasFiniteFirstMoment (f 0) + a flow-growth bound.
Given per-1-Lipschitz LSC of each summand t ↦ ENNReal.ofReal(∫φd(f t) - ∫φd(g t)),
the Wasserstein-1 distance wasserstein1 (f t) (g t) = ⨆ φ (_ : LipschitzWith 1 φ), …
is LowerSemicontinuousOn Set.Icc 0 T as a double supremum of LSC functions
via lowerSemicontinuousOn_iSup applied twice.
For a continuous function h : ℝ → ℝ on [0, T] with h(0) ≤ δ and with
right-derivative liminf bounded by C * h(s) for all s ∈ [0, T),
Gronwall's inequality gives h(t) ≤ δ * Real.exp(C * t) for all t ∈ [0, T].
This wraps Mathlib's le_gronwallBound_of_liminf_deriv_right_le with ε = 0
and then simplifies via gronwallBound_ε0.
Scalar mild-form Gronwall: a continuous nonnegative Q satisfying the
integral inequality Q t ≤ q0 + K · ∫₀ᵗ Q on [0, T] obeys
Q t ≤ q0 · exp (K t).
This is the mild-form companion to wassersteinGronwallCoupling_gronwall_le
(which takes the Dini/right-derivative form). The integrated coupling-Gronwall
bound produces Q(t) = ∫‖Φ_f t · − Φ_g t ·‖ dπ₀ in the integral form (via
per-trajectory FTC + Tonelli on a nonnegative integrand), sidestepping the
reverse-Fatou difference-quotient interchange. Proof: apply Mathlib's
norm_le_gronwallBound_of_norm_deriv_right_le to the C¹ primitive
G t = q0 + K · ∫₀ᵗ Q (with G' t = K · Q t ≤ K · G t since Q ≤ G), then
Q ≤ G.
For reals δ ≥ 0 and C > 0 and t ≥ 0, if r ≤ δ * Real.exp(C * t) then ENNReal.ofReal r ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (Real.exp (C * t)) * ENNReal.ofReal δ. Uses ENNReal.ofReal_mul and mul_comm to reorder the product.
If gradW is L-Lipschitz, then for any x : PhysSpace d and any two measures ρ, σ
on PhysSpace d, ‖(∇Wρ)(x) − (∇Wσ)(x)‖ ≤ L · W₁(ρ,σ).toReal.
This is the key estimate: the convolution ∇W * ρ is Lipschitz in ρ with respect to
the Wasserstein-1 distance, via Kantorovich–Rubinstein duality.
A thin wrapper around norm_convolveFunctionMeasure_sub_le.
(tex: eq:dobrushin) The exponential Wasserstein-1 stability estimate for Vlasov solutions (the content of Theorem thm:dobrushin):
W_1(f_t, g_t) ≤ e^{C·t} · W_1(f_0, g_0), for all t ≥ 0.
This Prop-valued definition packages the statement as a reusable predicate.
Equations
- Vlasov.DobrushinStabilityEstimate f g C = ∀ (t : ℝ), 0 ≤ t → Vlasov.wasserstein1 (f t) (g t) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (Real.exp (C * t)) * Vlasov.wasserstein1 (f 0) (g 0)
Instances For
§13 Corollary (Mean-field limit) (tex: cor:mfl) #
(tex: cor:mfl) Mean-field limit theorem.
Let f_0 ∈ 𝒫_1(ℝ^d × ℝ^d) and let (X^N, V^N) be the N-particle Newton trajectories. Write μ_0^N for the initial empirical measure of (X^N(0), V^N(0)). If μ_0^N → f_0 in W_1 as N → ∞ then, under Assumption ass:W and the Dobrushin estimate, for every T > 0,
sup_{t ∈ [0,T]} W_1(μ_t^N, f_t) ≤ e^{C·T} · W_1(μ_0^N, f_0) → 0, as N → ∞.
f_t is the unique Vlasov solution with initial datum f_0 (Theorem thm:vlasov-wp).
The .tex names the initial data (X_0^N, V_0^N); here we identify them with
X N 0 and V N 0 rather than introducing redundant X₀, V₀ parameters
that would need a separate hypothesis to link them to the trajectory.